Skip to content

Update github.com/osquery/osquery-go digest to eb39ad3#52

Open
ivan-flamingo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/github.com-osquery-osquery-go-digest
Open

Update github.com/osquery/osquery-go digest to eb39ad3#52
ivan-flamingo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/github.com-osquery-osquery-go-digest

Conversation

@ivan-flamingo

@ivan-flamingo ivan-flamingo commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/osquery/osquery-go require digest 629f995eb39ad3

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@ivan-flamingo ivan-flamingo force-pushed the renovate/github.com-osquery-osquery-go-digest branch from b74781b to 2dedccb Compare June 22, 2026 12:51
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@ivan-flamingo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 48 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: def7d7e8-da9b-4d18-ba5a-313737a665e5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6e40b8 and c02fe41.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch renovate/github.com-osquery-osquery-go-digest

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ivan-flamingo ivan-flamingo force-pushed the renovate/github.com-osquery-osquery-go-digest branch 2 times, most recently from 75bb7e4 to 1cc4810 Compare June 24, 2026 19:19
@ivan-flamingo ivan-flamingo changed the title Update github.com/osquery/osquery-go digest to 3e77344 Update github.com/osquery/osquery-go digest to eb39ad3 Jul 1, 2026
@ivan-flamingo ivan-flamingo force-pushed the renovate/github.com-osquery-osquery-go-digest branch from 1cc4810 to c02fe41 Compare July 1, 2026 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants